Hilsenrath v. Credit Suisse (Cs)

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 02 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HANA HILSENRATH and OLIVER No. 08-15230 HILSENRATH, D.C. No. CV-07-05374-WHA Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. MEMORANDUM * CREDIT SUISSE (CS) and UNITED BANK OF SWITZERLAND (UBS), Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 19, 2010 ** Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. Hana Hilsenrath and Oliver Hilsenrath appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal of their action against Credit Suisse and the United Bank of Switzerland * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). alleging that the banks failed to warn them through a product-warning label that the banks would not comply with the United States Constitution and its provisions to protect the constitutional right to property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review is de novo, Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc., 356 F.3d 1058, 1061 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s Order filed on January 10, 2008. AFFIRMED. -2- 08-15230