UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6774
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DEMORRIS ALEXANDER JAMES,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:05-cr-00161-JBF-JEB-1)
Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: November 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demorris Alexander James, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott
Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Demorris Alexander James appeals the district court’s
order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and
reducing his sentence from 180 months’ to 150 months’
imprisonment based on a two-level reduction. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
James, No. 2:05-cr-00161-JBF-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 2010); see
also Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2693-94 (2010)
(clarifying that § 3582(c)(2) does not authorize a resentencing,
but rather permits a sentence reduction within the narrow bounds
established by the Commission, and concluding that United States
v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), does not apply to § 3582(c)(2)
proceedings). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2