United States v. Craig Pfeiferling

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 10-2453 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Craig Alan Pfeiferling, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: October 25, 2010 Filed: November 5, 2010 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. In this direct criminal appeal, Craig Alan Pfeiferling challenges the sentence the district court1 imposed after revoking his supervised release. Upon careful review, we conclude that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005)). We have also reviewed Pfeiferling’s pro se arguments and find them to 1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. be meritless. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. ______________________________ -2-