Creative Compounds, Llc. v. Starmark Laboratories

l NOTE: This order is n0nprecedential. Un1ted States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit CREATIVE COMPOUNDS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. STARMARK LABORATORIES, Defendant-Appellee. ' 2010-1445 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the Southern District of F1orida in case n0. 07-CV-22814, Judge A1an S. Go1d. ON MOTION B<-efore GAJARsA, ScHALL, and M00RE, Circuit Ju,dges. SCHALL, Circuit Judge. ORDER Creative Co1npounds, LLC moves for a stay, pending disposition of this appea1, of the permanent injunction entered by the United States District C0urt for the South- ern District of F1orida. Star1nark Lab0rat0ries 0pposes. Creative replies Starmark moves for attorney fees and CREATIVE COMPOU`NDS V. STARMARK LAB 2 sanctions related to the motion for a stay and "Creative's two prior premature appeals to this Court and a petition for writ of mandamus." Creative opposes. To obtain a stay, pending appeal, a movant must es- tablish a strong likelihood of success on the merits or, failing that, nonetheless demonstrate a substantial case on the merits provided that the harm factors militate in its faVor. Stcmdard Hcwens Prods. v. Gen,cor Indus., 897 F.2d 511, 513 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (citing Hilton u. BraunskiZZ, 481 U.S. 77O, 778 (1987)). In deciding whether to grant a stay, pending appeal, this court “assesses the movant’s chances of success on the merits and weighs the equities as they affect the parties and the public." E.I. du Pont de Nemours & C0. u. Phillips Petroleum Co., 835 F.2d 277, 278 (Fed. Cir. 1987); see also Standard Hcwens Prods., 897 F.2d at 513. _ Based on the arguments in the motions papers, and without prejudicing the ultimate disposition____ of this case by a merits panel, we determine that Creative Com- pounds has not met its burden to obtain a stay of the permanent injunction We similarly determine that Starmark has not demonstrated that sanctions and attorney fees are warranted. Upon consideration thereof, IT ls 0RDERE:o THAT: The motions are denied. FOR THE COURT NOV 1 8 2010 131 Jan norway Date J an H0rbaly Clerk cc: MattheW A. Rosenberg, Esq. Frederick A. Tecce, Esq. FILED U.S. COURT 0F APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL C!RCUiT NOV 1 8 2010 .lAN HORBALY CLERK