In Re Saunders

NO'I‘E; This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit 1N RE CRA1G M. sAUNDERs, LINDsEY TUFTs, JR., and 1)Av1D J. BoLL 2010-1529 (Serial No. 10/858,224) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Offlce, Board of Patent Appeals and lnterferences. ON MOTION 1 ORDER k Upon consideration of Craig M. Saunders, Lindsey Tufts, Jr., and David J. Boll’s unopposed motion for a 60- day extension of time, until February 7, 2(}11, to file the opening brief, IT ls 0RDERED THAT: The motion is granted No further extensions should be anticipated lN RE SAUNDERS 2 FOR THE CoURT DEC 0 6 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly cc: Alan S. Kellman, ESq. Raymond T. Chen, Esq. s21 Clerk Fl LED U.S. COURT 0F APPEALS FOR THE FEDER£LL C%RCUlT DEC 06 2010 .|AN HORBALY CLERK - s_