United States v. Mosley

Case: 08-40979 Document: 00511315424 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 8, 2010 No. 08-40979 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CRAIG LAMARIO MOSLEY, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:98-CR-14-18 Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Craig Lamario Mosley, federal prisoner # 21362-009, was convicted of conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute and received the statutory minimum sentence of 240 months. He now appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines governing crack cocaine. The Government has moved for summary affirmance or, in the alternative, for an extension of time to file a brief. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 08-40979 Document: 00511315424 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2010 No. 08-40979 Because Mosley was sentenced to a mandatory statutory minimum, the district court lacked authority to grant a reduction under § 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Carter, 595 F.3d 575, 579-81 (5th Cir. 2010); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, comment (n.1(A)). Mosley’s reliance on the principles set forth in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), is without merit; Booker is inapplicable to a § 3582(c)(2) proceeding. See Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2691-94 (2010). The motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, and the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary. 2