Wilson v. C/O Roberts

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6949 FRED LEWIS WILSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. C/O ROBERTS; C/O TABOR; SGT. ELY, Defendants – Appellees, and B. COLLINS, SGT.; M. WILLIAMS, C/O; H. BISHOP, C/O; J. DURHAM, C/O; SGT. KING; LT. KILBOURNE; C/O HYLTON; C/O BOYD; TED THOMPSON, DR.; M. STANFORD, RN; MELISSA SPEARS, LPN; PATSY GARNETTE ZEPPA, RN; PATRICIA HILLMAN, RN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00638-gec-mfu) Submitted: December 6, 2010 Decided: December 22, 2010 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fred Lewis Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Fred Lewis Wilson appeals the district court’s judgment entered after a jury found in favor of Appellees and denied relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record, conclude that the issues Wilson raises do not present substantial questions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we decline to authorize preparation of the trial transcript at government expense and affirm the judgment of the district court. We grant Wilson’s motion to withdraw his September 2010 motion for production of documents and deny Wilson’s October 2010 motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3