Bright v. United States

NOTE: This order is r10nprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit EDWARD L. BRIGHT, II, CLARENCE FORKNER, HOMER E. HAMILTON, DEBBIE M. HAMILTON, RICKY D. RUSSELL, BRADY J. STUART, AND ROSE M. STUART, _ Plaintiffs-Appellants, ' and EARLEEN FAVERGUE, Plaintiff, V. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appe.llee. 2010-1385 Appea1 from the United States District C0111't for the Western District of Miss0uri in case n0. 09-CV-5014, Judge Richard E. D0rr. ON MOTION ORDER BRIGHT V. US 2 The appellants submit a response to the court’s June 9, 2010 order and move to continue the stay of proceed- ings until the United States files a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court in Bright v. United States, No. 2009-5048, and the Supreme Court issues a final decision or until the time expires for the United States to file a petition for a writ of certiorari Upon consideration thereof, IT ls 0RDERED THAT: The motion to continue the stay of proceedings is granted The parties are directed to file a status report every 60 days, from the date of filing of this order,_ con- cerning, inter aiia, whether a certiorari petition has been filed and the status of any petition. ' FOR THE CoURT _ DEC 2 8 mm /s/ Jan I'Iorbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk ccc l\/lark F. Hearne, lI, Esq. Kathryn E. Kovacs, Esq. _ FlLED S29 u.s.c0un'r or APPEm.s ma THE FEDERAL C|RCU|T DEC 2 ti 2010 .|AN HORBALY CLERK