United States v. Carlos Gonzalez-Salmeron

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 04 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10040 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:08-cr-01085-DCB v. MEMORANDUM * CARLOS GONZALEZ-SALMERON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 14, 2010 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. Carlos Gonzalez-Salmeron appeals from the 34-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Gonzalez-Salmeron contends that the district court procedurally erred by not adequately considering all the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. The district court did not procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Gonzalez-Salmeron also contends that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. In light of the totality of the circumstances, the district court’s sentence within the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable. See id. AFFIRMED. 2 10-10040