FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 20 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JORGE ALCIDES-TORRES, a.k.a. Jorge No. 07-72365
Mauricio Aldaco,
Agency No. A097-761-670
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 10, 2011 **
Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Jorge Alcides-Torres, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from the immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo
questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except
to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing
statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004).
We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d
849, 854 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.
The record does not compel the conclusion that Alcides-Torres established
changed or extraordinary circumstances sufficient to excuse his delay in filing his
asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a); Toj-Culpatan v. Holder, 612 F.3d
1088, 1090-92 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam); Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646,
657-58 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, we deny the petition as to
Alcides-Torres’ asylum claim.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Alcides-
Torres failed to establish the harm he suffered, or fears, from gangs is on account
of any protected ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 482-84 (1992)
(forced recruitment by persecutors seeking to fill their ranks is not necessarily
persecution on account of political opinion); Barrios, 581 F.3d at 855-56 (9th Cir.
2009) (petitioner who resisted gang recruitment did not establish persecution on
account of social group or political opinion); Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563 F.3d
2 07-72365
855, 862 (9th Cir. 2009) (same). Accordingly, Alcides-Torres’ withholding of
removal claim fails. See Barrios, 581 F.3d at 856; Ramos-Lopez, 563 F.3d at 862.
Finally, substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief
because Alcides-Torres did not establish a likelihood of being tortured in El
Salvador. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 747-48 (9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
3 07-72365