United States Court of Appeals
for the district of columbia circuit
No. 97-1245 September Term, 2000
Benkelman Telephone Company, et al., Filed On: September 26, 2000 [546131]
Petitioners
v.
Federal Communications Commission
and United States of America,
Respondents
Consolidated with 97-1294, 99-1247, 99-1251, 99-1331, 99-1337
Before: Williams, Sentelle and Henderson, Circuit Judges.
O R D E R
It is ORDERED by the court that the opinion filed by the court on July 28, 2000 be
amended to delete the text at page 8, line 25 through page 9, line8 ("Despite some general
similarities . . . within the meaning of section 309(j)(1).") and substitute the following
language:
The petitioners note that the two licensing schemes provide the same paging service
on the same frequencies, basically provide fill-in sites and maintain the same licensee
buildout requirements. Nevertheless, they themselves acknowledge, as they must,
that the geographic license scheme has wrought "fundamental alterations to the
paging industry's market structure and licensing schemes." Petitioners' Br. 30. Under
the geographic scheme non-incumbents can compete for the available spectrum,
however much remains, on equal footing with incumbents and successful applicants
have far greater freedom in selecting transmitter locations; yet at the same time new
licensees assume much more responsibility for researching site locations to protect
incumbents from interference. Given the new scheme's "fundamental" alterations,
we hold the FCC reasonably treated modification applications by incumbents as
"initial" applications within the meaning of section 309(j)(1).
Per Curiam
For the Court:
Mark Langer