Haynes v. Copco Steel

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ 99-20086 Summary Calendar __________________ LARRY HAYNES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COPCO STEEL, doing business as Russel Metals Co. Inc., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (H-98-CV-368) ______________________________________________ September 30, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Larry Haynes appeals from an adverse summary judgment dismissing his claims against appellee Copco Steel Company d/b/a Russel Metals. Haynes argues that the district court erred in dismissing both his breach of contract claim and his promissory estoppel claim. We find no merit in the arguments advanced by Haynes. After a careful review of the arguments presented on appeal and a de novo review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the district court, essentially for the reasons stated in the * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. succinct and well-reasoned Memorandum and Order of the district court dated December 28, 1998. AFFFIRMED 2