IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40837
Summary Calendar
DONALD WAYNE JOHNSON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT
OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
October 21, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, AND STEWART, Circuit Judges.
HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
Donald Wayne Johnson appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.
section 2254 petition. Johnson was convicted of capital murder
under Texas Penal Code section 19.03(a)(2) for murder during the
course of committing a robbery. He received a sentence of life
imprisonment. As he did on direct appeal, Johnson argues in his
habeas petition that there was insufficient evidence that he formed
the intent to rob the victim before or during the murder.
Johnson was convicted of stabbing a 74-year-old schoolteacher.
The state presented evidence that after the murder, Johnson
obtained false identification and cashed the victim’s paycheck,
drove the victim’s car, and was wearing the victim’s watch at the
time of arrest. Further, evidence suggested no motive other than
robbery for the murder. There was no evidence that Johnson had a
prior acquaintance with the victim. Johnson borrowed a weapon on
the morning of the murder and theft. The murder scene indicated no
signs of a fight between the victim and his killer.
Johnson’s case is distinguishable from Cruz v. State, on which
he relies. In that case, the defendant and victim roomed together,
the defendant claimed that they had an altercation leading to the
murder, and the state linked only the victim’s watch to the
defendant. The appellate court found insufficient evidence in
light of other plausible explanations for motive and the small
value of the stolen property. Cruz v. State, 629 S.W.2d 852, 858-
60 (Tex. App. 1982). In Johnson’s case, the evidence suggests no
other motive for the murder, and the amount of stolen property was
much more substantial.
This court finds that there was sufficient evidence to support
Johnson’s conviction for capital murder.
AFFIRMED.
2