IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 98-20870
________________________
PAULINO ZAVALA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the Untied States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
(H-97-CV-3098)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
September 14, 1999
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and SARAH S. VANCE,*
District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
We treat counsel’s letter of September 14, 1999, as a petition
for rehearing. The panel opinion contains two minor errors on
pages 2 and 4. The panel erroneously confused Officer Zavala’s
disciplinary case number (96-1832), with his personnel number
(84155). Thus, the panel was in error on page 2 of its opinion in
*
United States District Judge, Eastern District of Louisiana,
sitting by designation.
stating: “Thus, the City argues that because he can disclose no
information concerning his suspension in case number 84155,. . .”
and on page 4 of its opinion in stating: “A straightforward reading
of the writings in this case leads to a conclusion that each
agreement is limited to a specific waiver of Officer Zavala’s right
to appeal his twenty calendar day disciplinary suspension in a
specific case, number 84155.” In both respects, the opinion should
have referred to number 96-1832 instead of 84155. In this respect,
we amend the panel opinion to reflect these changes.
In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is
D E N I E D.