Williams v. Corrections Corp

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-60559 Conference Calendar MATTHEW A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA; PHILLIP MCLAURIN; BRIMAH, DR., Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:97-CV-188-B-B - - - - - - - - - - oOctober 20, 1999 Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Matthew A. Williams, Mississippi prisoner #33555, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, with prejudice, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Williams contends that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. However, the facts alleged in his complaint and expanded at the Spears hearing indicate that * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-60559 - 2 - Williams received extensive medical care for his injured knee, including surgery. Thus, whatever deficiencies there may have been in Williams’s treatment, if any, certainly do not rise to the level of establishing deliberate indifference on the part of the defendants. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. Williams’s appeal is without merit and therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of the present case and our dismissal of this appeal count as two strikes against Williams for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Williams that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.