The Bander Family Partnership v. Towerhill Wealth Management LLC

Check Treatment

Related Cases

CNET Networks, Inc. v. Jana Master Fund, Ltd.
Debra Gariety Horst O. Bischoff, as Trustee of Bischoff Family Trust Pamela Hanyzewki John J. Cline Thomas Allen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Thomas J. Shannon, Jr., as Trustee, Natural Parent and Guardian of Smv Holding Company, Pll Vincent Paul Charles Thornton, Individually and as Trustee, Sep Fred L. Millner Warren H. Hyde Caryl Hyde Teen Response, Incorporated Elizabeth B. Sponseller Michael J. Sponseller Terry Overholser and Lawrence Corman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, and Crystal N. Shannon City National Bank, a Banking Corporation Coast Partners Financial Corporation, Formerly Known as Coast Partners Securities, Incorporated, a California Corporation, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Intervenor-Plaintiff v. Grant Thornton, Llp, and Herman & Cormany Michael Graham Billy Jean Cherry Terry Lee Church Estate of J. Knox McConnell Philip C. Petty, Administrator Louis J. Pais Michael F. Gibson Andrew L. Rago Julian G. Budnick Gary Ellis J & J Construction Company Hermie Church Diversified Capital Markets Michael Patterson E.E. Powell & Company, Incorporated John Does 1-100 Robert Wagner Quantum Capital Corporation Ferris, Baker, Watts, Incorporated Scott & Stringfellow Nancy Vorono Gunnallen Financial Incorporated Jack Ingold Regis Securities Corporation, A/K/A Quantum Securities Corporation Nancy Vargo Tom Dooley Garvin Tankersley Ellen Turpin Lora McKinney Michael Patterson, Incorporated Kutak Rock Alan D. Strasser, an Individual Michael D. Lambert, an Individual Vida Headrick Evelyn Herron Jeanie Wimmer Virginia Burks Debra Bailey Susan Dalton Robbin White Constance Evans, and Melissa Quizenbeury Hog Pen Enterprises, Incorporated Jlt Enterprises Keystone Hardware C & H Ranch Marbil, Incorporated Hc & Tc Trust Dolores Hughes Bill Pack Wendy Pack Tammy Fisher Larry Fisher Herman Fisher Judy Kahl Andrew T. Rapoff Donna Marie Rapoff Michael A. Rapoff Danny Rapoff Nancy E. Kelanon David Rapoff Andrew J. Rapoff Michael J. Cherry Roslyn A. Cherry Leah M. Cherry Rachel L. Cherry Daniel T. Halsey Sunrise Automotive Group, Incorporated Nancy E. Kelahan Terry L. Rose, Intervenors-Defendants, and H. Lynden Graham, Jr., Trustee v. Advanta Mortgage Corporation USA Celink, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Compulink Service, Incorporated, Third Party and Hargrave Military Academy, a Non-Profit Corporation Waynesburg College, a Non-Profit Corporation Michael Cherry Timmy Cline Vickie Cline the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency First Commerce of America, Parties in Interest. United Bank, Incorporated, Formerly Known as United National Bank Terry Witt Gregory Witt David Witt Scott Witt Gary Witt Dennis Witt, Movants
Fraternity Fund Ltd. v. Beacon Hill Asset Management, LLC
Brandt v. Wand Partners
4th Street Investments, LLC v. Dowdell

THE BANDER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, L.P., Defendant Below, Appellant,
v.
TOWERHILL WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC, f/k/a CAPITAL PRIVATE WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC, TOWERHILL US EQUITIES, LLC, f/k/a NEWPORT NET PERFORMANCE LLC, TOWERHILL LONG/SHORT EQUITY, f/k/a CAPITAL PRIVATE WEALTH STOCK SELECTION LLC and TOWERHILL INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES, LLC, f/k/a CPW INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES, LLC, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees.

No. 474, 2008.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: October 16, 2008. Decided: November 3, 2008.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and RIDGELY, Justices.

ORDER

MYRON T. STEELE, Chief Justice.

This 3rd day of November 2008, it appears to the Court that:

(1) Defendant-appellant ("Defendant") has petitioned this Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 42 ("Rule 42"), to accept an appeal from the Court of Chancery's order dated September 8, 2008, which denied Defendant's motion to dismiss and granted plaintiffs-appellees' motion for preliminary injunction. On October 20, 2008, Defendant filed a motion seeking to stay the Court of Chancery's September 8 order. By order dated October 9, 2008, the Court of Chancery denied Defendant's application for certification of the interlocutory appeal and, alternatively, Defendant's motion for stay pending appeal.

(2) Applications for interlocutory review are addressed to the sound discretion of this Court and are granted only in exceptional circumstances. The Court has examined the Court of Chancery's September 8, 2008 order according to the criteria set forth in Rule 42. The Court concludes that exceptional circumstances as would merit interlocutory review of the order do not exist in this case.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory appeal is REFUSED. The motion to stay is MOOT.