Legal Research AI

United States v. Perez Lopez

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date filed: 1995-09-20
Citations: 66 F.3d 307
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases

September 20, 1995      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
                UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                         

No. 94-2134

                        UNITED STATES,

                          Appellee,

                              v.

                    JOSE LUIS PEREZ LOPEZ,

                    Defendant, Appellant.

                                         

         APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

               FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

      [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]
                                                                  

                                         

                            Before

                    Selya, Stahl and Lynch,
                       Circuit Judges.
                                                 

                                         

Ramon M. Gonzalez on brief for appellant.
                             
Guillermo  Gil, United  States  Attorney,  Jorge E.  Vega Pacheco,
                                                                             
Assistant United  States Attorney, Chief, Criminal  Division, and Jose
                                                                              
F. Blanco, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
                 

                                         

                                         


          Per Curiam.    Appellant  pled guilty  to a  single
                                

count indictment  charging him with illegal  reentry into the

United States in violation of 8  U.S.C.   1326(b)(2).  He was

sentenced at the low end of the relevant guidelines range, to

46 months  imprisonment.  He  challenges here only  the trial

court's  refusal  to  grant  a downward  departure  based  on

allegedly "extraordinary" family circumstances.

          The sentencing hearing transcript, however, clearly

reflects that  the trial  judge's decision  was  taken in  an

exercise   of  discretion,   and   was  not   based  on   any

misunderstanding as  to the  court's authority to  consider a

departure.   Accordingly, the  decision is not  reviewable on

appeal.  See United States v. Morrison, 46 F.3d 127, 130 (1st
                                                  

Cir. 1995); United States v. Romero, 32 F.3d 641, 653-54 (1st
                                               

Cir. 1994). 

          Appeal dismissed.  See Loc. R. 27.1.
                                            

                             -2-