United States v. Jiminez

November 29, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 95-1457 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JOAQUIN JIMENEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND [Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, Senior U.S. District Judge] Before Torruella, Chief Judge, Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and Stahl, Circuit Judge. Thomas G. Briody on brief for appellant. Sheldon Whitehouse, United States Attorney, and Craig N. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee. Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record. The district court's remarks, read as a whole, indicate that regardless whether defendant's state criminal offenses were concentrated or spread out, the court was not inclined to exercise its discretion to depart downward because the fact remained that defendant had engaged in serious misconduct. Consequently, we reject defendant's argument that he was sentenced on the basis of materially inaccurate information. The judgment is summarily affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1. -2-