January 18, 1996 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 95-1717
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
v.
DARREL C. BULLINS,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge,
Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lynch, Circuit Judge.
Michael A. Goldsmith, with whom Stephen Hrones and Hrones &
Garrity were on brief, for appellant.
Jean B. Weld, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom
Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, was on brief, for the
United States.
Per Curiam. The arguments proffered by the defendant
Per Curiam
on appeal were not made in the district court and are, therefore,
waived. See United States v. Slade, 980 F.2d 27, 30 (1st Cir.
1992); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3), 12(f). And while this
omission leaves the record insufficiently developed to permit
definitive review for plain error (a deficiency which, itself,
precludes relief, see United States v. Barletta, 644 F.2d 50, 54-
55 (1st Cir. 1981)), we see nothing at this point that would
impel us to grant extraordinary relief on that basis. See United
States v. Olano, 113 S.Ct. 1770 (1993) (elucidating standard for
plain error).
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27.1.
2