[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 96-1604
FRED DAVIS,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
WONDERLAND GREYHOUND PARK, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Fred Davis on brief pro se.
Stephen B. Reed and Kearns & Rubin, P.C. on brief for appellees.
August 27, 1996
Per Curiam. Having reviewed the entire record,
including the transcript of the June 30, 1995 truncated
deposition at which plaintiff claims he was harassed, we
summarily affirm the dismissal of plaintiff's action for the
reasons stated in the district court's April 11, 1996
memorandum and order. Plaintiff was not unfairly treated at
the deposition and plaintiff was afforded multiple
opportunities to complete the deposition. When plaintiff
failed without any adequately documented justification to
appear for the rescheduled deposition, the court did not
abuse its discretion in dismissing plaintiff's action.
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.
-2-