Solomon v. Cheney

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 97-1464 DENNIS J. SOLOMON, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. KIMBERLY CHENEY, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge] Before Selya, Boudin and Lynch, Circuit Judges. Dennis J. Solomon on brief pro se. Carol A. Griffin, W illiam T. Bogaert and Morrison, Mahoney & Miller on Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion of Defendant-Appellee, Kimberly Cheney, for Summary Affirmance. November 14, 1997 Per Curiam. Pro se plaintiff Dennis Solomon appeals a district court judgment that dismissed his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. S 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff is not a prisoner. He did not seek to proceed in forma pauperis, but rather paid the full fee for filing his complaint. Thus, it is not entirely clear that the foregoing statute, which generally applies to prisoners seeking to proceed in forma pauperis, applies to this case. Nevertheless, having thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties' briefs on appeal, this court agrees that the instant action is frivolous and that plaintiff can prove no set of facts that would entitle him to relief. Nor do we see any merit to the plaintiff's unsupported claim of bias on the part of the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is summarily affirmed. See Local Rule 27.1. -2-