United States v. Kingsbury

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 97-2332 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. DAVID L. KINGSBURY AND ELIZABETH A. MASTERS, Defendants, Appellants. APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge] Before Boudin, Circuit Judge, Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lynch, Circuit Judge. David L. Kingsbury and Elizabeth A. Masters on brief pro se. Loretta C. Argrett, Assistant Attorney General, Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, William S. Estabrook and John A. Nolet, Attorneys, Tax Division, Department of Justice, on brief for appellee. June 23, 1998 Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal. We affirm on grounds that the appellants made no attempt to show that they are entitled to relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). They have not shown that they had good cause for the default, a meritorious defense to the action, or any other grounds which would have entitled them to relief under Rule 60(b). United States v. Proceeds of Sale of 3888 pounds Atlantic Sea Scallops, 857 F.2d 46, 49 (1st Cir. 1988). The provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1655 have no bearing on this issue because service below was not made pursuant to that statute. Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.