PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rodney Ray ARMSTRONG, Defendant-Appellant.
Docket No. 230304.
Court of Appeals of Michigan.
Submitted July 10, 2001, at Lansing. Decided September 14, 2001, at 9:00 a.m. Released for Publication December 12, 2001.Robert S. Dombroski, North Street, for the defendant on appeal.
Before WILDER, P.J., and HOOD and GRIFFIN, JJ.
*786 PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals by delayed leave granted from an eight-to-fifteen-year sentence imposed for a conviction of second-degree criminal sexual conduct (CSC). MCL 750.520c. We affirm but remand for completion of a guidelines departure form. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E)(1)(b).
Defendant's sole claim on appeal is that his minimum sentence, which represents a fourfold increase of the highest minimum sentence under the guidelines, violated the principle of proportionality under People v. Milbourn, 435 Mich. 630, 636, 461 N.W.2d 1 (1990). We review for an abuse of discretion the trial court's decision that objective and verifiable factors constitute substantial and compelling reasons for departing from the guidelines' recommended minimum sentence. People v. Fields, 448 Mich. 58, 69-70, 528 N.W.2d 176 (1995); People v. Babcock, 244 Mich.App. 64, 75-76, 624 N.W.2d 479 (2000).
The instant offense was committed in May 2000, making it subject to the statutory sentencing guidelines. MCL 769.34(2); People v. Reynolds, 240 Mich.App. 250, 253, 611 N.W.2d 316 (2000). Second-degree CSC is a class C felony subject to a fifteen-year maximum sentence. MCL 750.520c(2); 777.16y. The guidelines, as scored, placed defendant in the A IV category, which provides for a minimum sentence range of twelve to twenty-four months. MCL 777.64. The court must impose a minimum sentence within the guidelines range unless a departure from the guidelines is permitted. MCL 769.34(2). The court may depart from the guidelines if it "has a substantial and compelling reason for that departure and states on the record the reasons for departure." MCL 769.34(3). The court may depart from the guidelines for nondiscriminatory reasons where there are legitimate factors not considered by the guidelines or where factors considered by the guidelines have been given inadequate or disproportionate weight. MCL 769.34(3)(a), (b); People v. Castillo, 230 Mich.App. 442, 448, 584 N.W.2d 606 (1998). See also People v. Nelson, 234 Mich.App. 454, 464, 594 N.W.2d 114 (1999).
Defendant has an uncontrollable sexual attraction toward little boys, apparently as a result of his history of sexual abuse. The trial court did not err in finding that this is a factor not adequately considered by the guidelines. People v. Brzezinski (After Remand), 196 Mich.App. 253, 255-256, 492 N.W.2d 781 (1992). The trial court also did not err in finding that the need to protect other children by the sentence imposed is another factor not adequately considered by the guidelines. People v. Miller, 165 Mich.App. 32, 51, 418 N.W.2d 668 (1987). Further, the guidelines take into account psychological injury to the victim requiring therapy, M.C.L. § 777.34, but do not take into account the violation of the victim's parents' trust in defendant, the effect on the family occasioned by the victim's loss of trust in all men, including his own father, or the effect on the victim and his sister from having to learn about sexual matters at such a young age. We also note that the prosecutor's decision, in exchange for defendant's guilty plea, to dismiss a charge of first-degree CSC, which carries a potential life sentence, and the fact that defendant was not charged with attempted CSC for trying to have the victim perform oral sex on him are additional factors that the court can consider when deciding whether departure is warranted. People v. Williams, 223 Mich.App 409, 411, 566 N.W.2d 649 (1997); People v. Coulter (After Remand), 205 Mich.App. 453, 456, 517 N.W.2d 827 (1994); Brzezinski, supra at 256, 492 N.W.2d 781. Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its *787 discretion in finding substantial and compelling reasons for departing upward from the guidelines.
Although the trial court articulated its reasons for the departure on the record, it failed to complete a guidelines departure form as required. People v. Fleming, 428 Mich. 408, 428, 410 N.W.2d 266 (1987); People v. Bennett, 241 Mich.App. 511, 516, 616 N.W.2d 703 (2000). Accordingly, we remand for completion of that ministerial task.
Affirmed but remanded for completion of a guidelines departure form. We do not retain jurisdiction.