United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-2431
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Calvin Wedington, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: January 27, 2011
Filed: February 8, 2011
___________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal prisoner Calvin Wedington is serving a life sentenced imposed in 1982
after he pleaded guilty to second-degree murder. He has been confined at the Federal
Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota (FMC Rochester) since 2005, pursuant to a
commitment order under 18 U.S.C. § 4245, which provides for the hospitalization of
an imprisoned person suffering from a mental disease or defect, until he no longer
needs treatment or his prison sentence expires, whichever occurs first. He appeals the
district court’s1 order denying his request under 18 U.S.C. § 4247(h) to be discharged
from his commitment, on the ground that he no longer needed treatment.
Following careful review, we conclude that the district court’s finding that
Wedington was in need of ongoing commitment for mental-health treatment was
supported by a preponderance of the evidence and not clearly erroneous. See 18
U.S.C. § 4245(d) (determination of mental illness and treatment need, and burden of
proof); 18 U.S.C. § 4247(h) (providing for motion for hearing to determine whether
person confined under § 4245, inter alia, should be discharged); United States v. Bean,
373 F.3d 877, 879 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review of § 4245 order); United States
v. Frierson, 208 F.3d 282, 283 (1st Cir. 2000) (commitment under § 4245 continues
until earlier of expiration of sentence, determination by director of medical facility
that prisoner is no longer in need of hospitalization, or determination by court by
preponderance of evidence after hearing upon motion by counsel for committed
person that he should be discharged). Notwithstanding Wedington’s denial of mental
illness, his exemplary behavior while medicated, and his concern about the side
effects of his medication, the district court’s finding was supported by Wedington’s
history of declining mental health upon stopping his antipsychotic medication, his lack
of insight into his mental illness, his plan to stop taking his antipsychotic medication,
and the testimony of the FMC Rochester chief of psychology that Wedington’s life
would be endangered if he discontinued his antipsychotic medication, in part because
of the resulting risk that he would stop taking medication for his medical conditions.
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Susan Richard
Nelson, then a United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, now
United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-