Griffith v. Bird

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-8093 JOSEPH MICHAEL GRIFFITH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. S. A. BIRD; BETTY BROWN, Defendants – Appellees, and RICH JACKSON; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cv-00308-GCM) Submitted: January 12, 2011 Decided: February 8, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Michael Griffith, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffith v. Bird, No. 3:06-cv-00308-GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2