United States v. Philip D. Smith

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13368 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FEB 11, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY ________________________ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00079-JEC-GGB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILLIP SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _________________________ (February 11, 2011) Before BLACK, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Michael Trost, appointed counsel for Phillip Smith, in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because counsel believes that the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2