IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________
m 99-11328
Summary Calendar
_______________
DONNA J. STEVENS-SMITH,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(3:99-CV-1020)
_________________________
April 5, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and retaliation.
PARKER, Circuit Judges.
It is evident that Stevens-Smith was fired
PER CURIAM:* because, as she admits, she refused to follow
her supervisor’s specific instruction to change
Donna Stevens-Smith sued her former her method of processing her work. As the
employer for sexual harassment and retaliation district court found, most of the statements of
under title VII. In a comprehensive which she complains were made beyond the
memorandum opinion and order entered on limitations period, but even assuming
November 3, 1999, the district court carefully arguendo that this action is not time-barred,
explained that Stevens-Smith has produced no none of the alleged actions or statements can
summary judgment evidence of harassment or fairly be deemed sexual harassment or
retaliation.
Stevens-Smith bases her claim on little
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has more than self-serving speculation designed to
determined that this opinion should not be published obscure poor job performance. Essentially for
and is not precedent except under the limited the reasons persuasively set forth by the
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
district court, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
2