United States v. Dang Van Pham

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 17 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50511 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00510-AHM v. MEMORANDUM * DANG VAN PHAM, a.k.a. John D. Pham, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California A. Howard Matz, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 15, 2011 ** Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Dang Van Pham appeals from the 37-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for willful failure to pay withheld payroll taxes, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7202 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We dismiss. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pham contends that the district court’s application of the two-level offense role enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) is not supported by the record and violates his due process rights. We are precluded from reaching the merits of Pham’s claim by a valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958-59 (9th Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Bibler, 486 F.3d 621, 624 (9th Cir. 2007). DISMISSED. 2 09-50511