FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 02 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE JULIO HUERTA GUERRERO, No. 09-70714
Petitioner, Agency No. A079-165-365
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 15, 2011 **
Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Jose Julio Huerta Guerrero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from
an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review constitutional
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
claims de novo, Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516 (9th Cir. 2001), and we deny the
petition for review.
We reject Huerta Guerrero’s contention that his equal protection and due
process rights were violated because he should have been allowed to apply for
suspension of deportation relief. See Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105,
1108-09 (9th Cir. 2003) (Congress comported with equal protection and due
process when it repealed suspension of deportation for aliens placed in removal
proceedings on or after April 1, 1997); Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft, 291 F.3d 594,
602-03 (9th Cir. 2002) (line-drawing decisions made by Congress or the Executive
Branch in immigration matters must be upheld if they are rationally related to a
legitimate government purpose).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 09-70714