United States v. Juan Tunez-Martinez

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 08 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10339 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00820-JMR v. MEMORANDUM * JUAN TUÑEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John M. Roll, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted February 15, 2011 ** Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Juan Tuñez-Martinez appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Tuñez-Martinez contends that the sentence imposed is unreasonable due to * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the age of the prior violent felony conviction used to impose a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez, 567 F.3d 1050, 1054-56 (9th Cir. 2009). The sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable under the totality of the circumstances. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). AFFIRMED. 2 10-10339