UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7643
TITUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER GERAGHTY; IMANI GREEN, Inmate #337-646; JESSE
THOMAS, Inmate #340-968; JUSTIN CHANEY, Inmate #348-112;
SERGEANT MIDDLETON,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 10-7666
TITUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT MIDDLETON; OFFICER FRAS; OFFICER KENDALL; CAPTAIN
WALLS (MCTC),
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 10-7764
TITUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT HUFF; SERGEANT R. LIKIN; SERGEANT JOHN IHEOMA; P.
KNIGHT, Case Manager; JESSE THOMAS, Inmate; DONALD FOSTER,
Inmate; JUSTIN CHANEY, Inmate; WILLIAM COOL, Inmate; TERRY
MILLER, Inmate,
Defendants - Appellees.
v.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Party-in-Interest.
No. 11-6051
TITUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AJALA, Sgt.; A. YUSUT; HARRIS, Sgt.; AMAGHIONYEODIWE,
Officer,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JUSTIN CHANEY, inmate #348-112; ANTONIO WATSON, inmate #336-
897; TERRY MILLER, inmate #274-682; MARCUS SHANNON, inmate
#281-148,
Defendants.
No. 11-6055
TITUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
2
JAMES TICHNELL, Case Management Supervisor; P. KNIGHT, Case
Manager; LT. FRIEND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:10-cv-01478-AW; 8:10-cv-01494-AW; 8:10-cv-02153-AW;
8:10-cv-02090-AW; 8:10-cv-02523-AW)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Titus Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Titus Thomas challenges
the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) complaints, denying reconsideration of those
orders, and denying Thomas’ motions to compel discovery and for
the appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Middleton,
No. 8:10-cv-01478-AW (D. Md. Nov. 17 & Dec. 8, 2010); Thomas v.
Middleton, No. 8:10-cv-01494-AW (D. Md. Nov. 17 & Dec. 8, 2010);
Thomas v. Huff, No. 8:10-cv-02153-AW (D. Md. Dec. 8 & Dec. 29,
2010); Thomas v. Ajala, No. 8:10-cv-02090-AW (D. Md. Dec. 29,
2010); Thomas v. Tichnell, No. 8:10-cv-02523-AW (D. Md. Dec. 29,
2010). We further deny Thomas’ motions for the appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
4