IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-11232
(Summary Calendar)
MARY E. STENERSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(2:97-CV-267)
--------------------
May 22, 2000
Before POLITZ, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellant Mary E. Stenerson appeals from the
district court’s judgment affirming the denial of her application
for disability insurance benefits. She argues that the decision of
the administrative law judge (ALJ) that she was not disabled was
not supported by substantial evidence. A review of the record
shows that the ALJ’s decision that Stenerson was not disabled is
supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See
Anthony v. Sullivan, 954 F.2d 289, 292 (5th Cir. 1992).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2