UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2257
DEIRDRE C. GLASCOE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND; JACK B. JOHNSON,
Individually and in his official capacity; MARTIN O’MALLEY,
Individually and in his official capacity; DOUGLAS F.
GANSLER, In his official capacity only; ROBERT M. BELL,
Individually and in his official administrative capacity;
MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS; WILLIAM D. MISSOURI,
Individually and in his official administrative capacity;
GLENN F. IVEY, Individually and in his official capacity;
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DISTRICT COURT; PRINCE GEORGE’S
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; MARYLAND ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE
COMMISSION; MARYLAND COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISABILITIES;
THOMAS P. SMITH, Individually and in his official
administrative capacity and in his official judicial
capacity; C. PHILIP NICHOLS, JR., Individually and in his
official judicial capacity; THOMAS J. LOVE, Individually
and in his official administrative capacity and in his
official judicial capacity; JOHN DOE, Individually and in
his official judicial capacity aka Judge C; PEGGY MAGEE,
Individually and in her official capacity; MARY ABRAMS,
Individually and in her official capacity; STAN BROWN,
Individually and in his official capacity as People's
Zoning Counsel,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00710-AW)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deirdre C. Glascoe, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Thibodeau, PRINCE
GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Hugh
Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
Baltimore, Maryland; Phillip Robert Zuber, SASSCER, CLAGETT &
BUCHER, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Deirdre C. Glascoe appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Glascoe v. Prince
George’s Cnty., Md, No. 8:10-cv-00710-AW (D. Md. Nov. 8, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3