FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 18 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MOHAMMAD HUMAYUN KABIR, No. 08-70215
Petitioner, Agency No. A095-634-742
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 8, 2011 **
Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Mohammad Humayun Kabir, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from
an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for withholding of
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
evidence, Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir. 2003), and
we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that, even if Kabir was
persecuted on account of a protected ground, the government rebutted the
presumption of a clear probability of future persecution by establishing changed
circumstances in Bangladesh. See Gonzalez-Hernandez, 336 F.3d at 999-1001.
The IJ rationally construed evidence in the record and provided a sufficiently
individualized analysis of Kabir’s situation. See id. at 1000. Accordingly, Kabir’s
withholding of removal claim fails. See id. at 1001 n.5.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 08-70215