FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 29 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LIJUN LIU, No. 09-73196
Petitioner, Agency No. A097-371-338
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 8, 2011 **
Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Lijun Liu, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We
have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.
2010), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Liu’s motion to reopen as
untimely because the motion was filed over two years after the BIA’s final
administrative decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Liu failed to demonstrate
changed country conditions to qualify for an exception to the time limit for filing
such motions, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 986-990.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 09-73196