Lijun Liu v. Eric Holder, Jr.

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 29 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LIJUN LIU, No. 09-73196

Petitioner, Agency No. A097-371-338

v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011 **

Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Lijun Liu, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.

2010), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Liu’s motion to reopen as

untimely because the motion was filed over two years after the BIA’s final

administrative decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Liu failed to demonstrate

changed country conditions to qualify for an exception to the time limit for filing

such motions, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 986-990.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 09-73196