United States v. Marcial Cardenas-Villanueva

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 29 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30207 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00133-FVS v. MEMORANDUM * MARCIAL CARDENAS-VILLANUEVA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 8, 2011 ** Before: FARRIS, O’SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Marcial Cardenas-Villanueva appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to manufacture 1,000 or more marijuana plants, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and destruction of government * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1361. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Cardenas-Villanueva contends that the district court clearly erred at sentencing by denying safety-valve relief based on its determination that Cardenas- Villanueva failed to meet his burden of establishing that he had truthfully provided to the government all of the information he had concerning the offense. The record reflects that the district court did not clearly err. See United States v. Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1284 (9th Cir. 2006) (“So long as the district court’s view of the evidence is plausible in light of the record viewed in its entirety, it cannot be clearly erroneous.”). AFFIRMED. 2 10-30207