United States v. Stansel

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APR 18, 2011 No. 10-14078 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:91-cr-00272-JDW-EAJ-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAYMOND GRADY STANSEL, JR., lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (April 18, 2011) Before CARNES, HULL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donna Lee Elm, appointed counsel for Raymond Grady Stansel, Jr. in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Stansel’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2