United States v. Angel Vasquez-Salguero

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 21 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10377 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-CR-01204-SRB-1 v. MEMORANDUM * ANGEL DANILO VASQUEZ- SALGUERO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 11, 2011 San Francisco, California Before: FERNANDEZ and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and WELLS, Senior District Judge.** Angel Danilo Vasquez-Salguero appeals the district court's application of a sixteen-level enhancement to his sentence for illegal reentry after deportation. The * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Lesley Wells, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. district court concluded, without analysis, that Vasquez-Salguero’s prior burglary conviction under Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-1507 qualified as a crime of violence. We have previously held that Arizona burglary does not categorically match the generic federal definition. See United States v. Bonat, 106 F.3d 1472, 1475-76 (9th Cir. 1997). Therefore, whether the appellant’s prior conviction qualifies as a crime of violence depends upon application of the modified categorical approach described in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 602, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). The district court’s failure to conduct this analysis was plain error. Therefore, we reverse and remand for resentencing on an open record pursuant to United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 889 (9th Cir. 2002)(en banc). REVERSED AND REMANDED. 2