FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 27 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARELY YAZMIN GUERRA CRUZ, No. 09-71933
Petitioner, Agency No. A095-451-467
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 5, 2011 **
Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Arely Yazmin Guerra Cruz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to
reissue its previous decision denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
reopen, and review de novo claims of due process violations. Hernandez-
Velasquez v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition
for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion or violate due process in denying
Guerra Cruz’s motion to reissue because it had properly mailed the earlier decision
at Guerra Cruz’s last known addresses. See Singh v. Gonzales, 494 F.3d 1170,
1172 (9th Cir. 2007) (BIA fulfills its statutory duty of service if the decision is
mailed to the appropriate party at his or her address of record); Lata v. INS, 204
F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error for petitioner to prevail on a due
process claim).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 09-71933