UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2269
MAZHAR KHAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: April 20, 2011 Decided: April 29, 2011
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mazhar Khan, Petitioner Pro Se. Paul Thomas Cygnarowicz, Daniel
Eric Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration
Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mazhar Khan, a native and citizen of Pakistan,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider. We have
reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and
find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion to reconsider as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2)
(2010). We therefore deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Khan (B.I.A. Oct. 15,
2010). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
*
We have limited our review to the Board’s denial of Khan’s
motion to reconsider. Although Khan raises issues in his
informal brief pertaining to the Board’s December 10, 2009
decision, which upheld the immigration judge’s denial of Khan’s
motion to reopen, we lack jurisdiction over these claims as Khan
did not file a timely petition for review of that decision. See
Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 394, 405 (1995).
2