UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7639
MICHAEL ANTHONY MCKEOWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General; JOHN W. MCINTOSH, Chief
Deputy Attorney General; DONALD JOHN ZELENKA, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General; SAMUEL CREIGHTON WATERS, Senior
Assistant Attorney General; SALLEY W. ELLIOT, Assistant
Attorney General,
Defendants,
and
KAREN C. RATIGAN, Assistant Attorney General; RODNEY WADE
RICHEY; C. DENTON MATTHEWS, Assistant Solicitor; LINDA
WHISENHUNT, Solicitor; SKIP GOLDSMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-00655-JMC)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Anthony McKeown, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry
Davidson, II, Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA,
Columbia, South Carolina; Rodney Wade Richey, Greenville, South
Carolina; Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN & PARKINSON, PA,
Greenville, South Carolina; James Lee Goldsmith, Jr.,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Anthony McKeown appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and its
subsequent orders denying his motion to alter or amend filed
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. McKeown v. Ratigan, No.
1:09-cv-00655-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 2, 2010). We deny McKeown’s
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3