FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 05 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IRIS CAROLINA MOYA-VALENCIA, No. 09-70567
Petitioner, Agency No. A094-917-952
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 20, 2011 **
Before: RYMER, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Iris Carolina Moya-Valencia, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her
appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for
asylum and withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de
novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008),
except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the
governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th
Cir. 2004). We review for substantial evidence factual findings. Zehatye v.
Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in
part the petition for review.
We reject Moya-Valencia’s claim that she is eligible for asylum and
withholding of removal based on her membership in a particular social group. See
Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2008) (rejecting as a
particular social group “young men in El Salvador resisting gang violence”);
Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563 F.3d 855, 860-62 (9th Cir. 2009) (rejecting as a
particular social group “young Honduran men who have been recruited by [a
gang], but who refuse to join.”). Moya-Valencia’s contention that the Court should
consider her political opinion or imputed political opinion was not raised to the
agency. See Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks
jurisdiction over issues not previously raised to the BIA); Velasco-Cervantes v.
Holder, 593 F.3d 975, 978 n. 3 (9th Cir. 2010) (no jurisdiction to consider political
opinion not raised to the agency).
2 09-70567
Accordingly, because Moya-Valencia failed to demonstrate that she was
persecuted on account of a protected ground, we deny the petition as to her asylum
and withholding of removal claims. See Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 856 (9th
Cir. 2009).
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of Moya-Valencia’s CAT
claim because she failed to show it is more likely than not that she will be tortured
if returned to El Salvador. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 747-48
(9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
3 09-70567