NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit IN RE MORGAN STANLEY, MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED, J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, INC., J.P. MORGAN CLEARING CORP., CREDIT SUISSE HOLDINGS (USA), INC., CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC, THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC., GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., GOLDMAN SACHS EXECUTION & CLEARING LP, SWS GRUP, INC., AND SOUTHWEST SECURITIES, INC., Petitioners. ` Misce11ane0us Docket No. 962 On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District C0urt for the Eastern District of TeXas in case no. 09-CV-0326, Judge Leonard DaVis. IN RE BATS TRADING, INC. (ALso KNoWNAs BATS ExoHANGE, INc.), THE NASDAQ OMX GROUP, INC., NASDAQ OMX PHLX, INC., INTERNATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE, LLC, CHICAGO BOARD 0PTIONS EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED, NYSE EURONEXT, NYSE ARCA, INC., NYSE AMEX, LLC, SECURITIES INDUSTRY AUTOMATION IN RE MORGAN STANLEY 2 CORPORATION, OPTIONS PRICE REPORTING AUTHORITY, BOSTON OPTIONS EXCHANGE GROUP, LLC, CME GROUP, INC., BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC., AND NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, INC., Petiti0ners. Misce1laneous Docket No. 964 On Petition for W1'it of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case nos. 09-CV-0327, Judge Leo11ard Davis. IN RE THOMSON REUTERS CORPORA:I‘ION, FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC., BLOOMBERG L.P. AND INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION, Petiti0ners. Miscel1aneous Docket No. 967 On Petition for Wri1; of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 6:09-CV-00333, Judge Leonard Davis. Be-fore RAoER, Ch£ef Judge, NEWMAN and BRYsoN, Circu,i.t Judges; PER CURIAM. 3 1N RE MoRGAN sTANLEY 0 R D E R Upon consideration of CME Group, Inc.’s motion for a stay of proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied.* FoR THE CoURT HA¥ 1 1 2011 /S/ Jan H0rba1y Date J an Horba1y _ C1erk - ocr Danie1A. DeVito, Esq. us _ F"_ED §:§::;t§:;;»,aPSq~ Scott F. Partridge, Esq. HAY '*-1 1 2011 Rick L. Ran1bo, Esq. David R. Francescani, Esq. mg 1.mR5ALy Michae1M. Murray, Esq. C|_[|qK Lynn E. Rzonca, Esq. J ames H. Sha1ek, Esq. Benjamin W. Hattenbach, Esq. Constance S. Huttner, Esq. John M. DiMatteo, Esq. Brian E. Moran, Esq. C1erk, United States District Court For The Eastern District Of Texas s19 " With regard to the parties’ arguments regarding when this court’s mandate may issue, we note that this court does not issue mandates relating to petitions for writs of n1andamus. Fed. Cir. R. 40(e).
In Re Morgan Stanley
Combined Opinion