Gpx International Tire v. United States

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wndell ~tate5 Court of ~eaI5 for tbe jfelleraI <!Circuit GPX INTERNATIONAL TIRE CORPORATION AND HEBEl STARBRIGHT TIRE CO., LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellees, AND TIANJIN UNITED TIRE & RUBBER INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant, AND TITAN TIRE CORPORATION AND UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, Defendants-Appellants, AND BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. AND BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC, Defendants-Appellants. GPX INTL TIRE CORP v. US 2 2011-1107, -1108, -1109 Appeals from the United States Court ofInternational Trade in consolidated case no. 08-CV-0285, Judge Jane A. Restani. ON MOTION Before GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves for a 26-day extension of time, until June 1, 2011, to file its reply brief and an increase of 7,000 words for its reply brief. GPX International Tire Corporation and Hebei Starbright Tire Co., Ltd. oppose. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al. and Titan Tire Corporation et al. move for a 26-day extension of time, until June 1, 2011, to file its reply brief. GPX International Tire Corporation et al. oppose. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motions for extensions oftime are granted. (2) The United States' motion for an increase of 7,000 words for its reply brief is denied. FOR THE COURT MAY 182011 lsI Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED '.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT MAY 18 2011 JA/t /i&lRBAlY ClERK 3 GPX INTL TIRE CORP v. US cc: Alan H. Price, Esq. Wesley K. Caine, Esq. Kathleen W. Cannon, Esq. Joseph W. Dorn, Esq. Roger B. Schagrin, Esq. Daniel L. Porter, Esq. Francis J. Sailer, Esq. Michael D. Panzera, Esq. Jeffrey D. Gerrish, Esq. s24