Blair v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit DON A. BLAIR, Claimant-Appellant, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ' Respondent-Appellee. 2010-7137 Appeal from the United States Court of Appea1s for Veterans Clai1ns in case n0. 08-1676, Judge Bruce E. Kaso1d. Before RA1)ER, Chief Judge, LoURiE and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges. RADER, Chief Judge. 0 R D E R The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds to this c0urt’s order directing Don A. Blair to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as unti1ne1y. B1air has not responded to the court's order. The Court of Appea1s for Veterans C1ai1ns entered judgment in this case on June 21, 2010. The docket sheet BLAIR V. DVA 2 of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims indicates that that court received Blair’s notice of appeal on August 23, or 63 days after entry of judgment. Any appeal of the judgment of the Court of Appea1s for Veterans Claims had to be received within 60 days of the date of entry of judgment 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). Thus, we do not have jurisdiction and this appeal must be dismissed. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007) (the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional re- quirement); Sofarelli Assoc., In,c. u. United States, 716 F.2d 1395 (Fed. Cir. 19S3). Accordingly, IT lS ORDERED THATZ (1) The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. ' FOR THE COURT 2 0 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Roger W. Rutherford, Esq. ED P. Davis Oliver, Esq. AppEALs mg S20 L ClRCUiT §§ §§ 3 §§ MAY 20 2011 JAuHoI-mv coins