Norman v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit GLENN A. NORMAN, C'laimant-Appellant, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appel.lee. 2011-7U38 Appea1 from the United States C0urt of Appea1s for Veterans Claims in case n0. 08-228, Judge Bruce E. Kas01d. ON MOTION _ Bef0re RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and O’MALLEY, Cir- wit Judges. RADER, C'h,ief Judge. 0 R D E R The Secretary of Veterans AfEairs moves without op- position to vacate the judgment of the United States NORMAN V. DVA 2 C0urt of Appeals for Veterans Claims and to remand for further proceedings. The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Veterans Claims more than 120 days after the Board of Veterans’ Appeals mailed its decision in his case. That court dismissed the appeal as untimely, concluding that the 120-day appeal period established by 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a) for seeking review of Board of Veterans’ Appeals decisions is jurisdictional and not subject to equitable tolling. The appellant sought this court's revieW. This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal pending the United States Supreme Court’s review of our decision in Henders0n v. Shinseki, 589 F.3d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (en banc) (affirming Court of Appea1s for Vet- erans Claims determination that period to appeal to that court is not subject to equitable tolling). In Henderson ex rel. Hen,ders0n u. Shinseki, 131 S.Ct. 1197 (2011), the Supreme Court reversed this court’s decision and con- cluded that the 120»day deadline for filing an appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims does not have jurisdictional consequences. Because the Court of Ap- peals for Veterans Claims erred in concluding that the appeal deadline established by § 7266(a) is jurisdictional, we vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment and remand for further proceedings Accordingly, lT lS ORDERED THAT2 (1) The motion is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings. (2) All sides shall bear their own costs. 3 NORMAN V. DVA FOR THE COURT _ lsi Jan Horbal_v Date J an Horbaly Clerk ccc Douglas J. Rosinski, Esq. S Tara K. Hogan, Esq. Issued As A Mandate: 2 5 Fl _ s.s. count cl-’l':\l=)PE.\Ls ron ms renew macon ` HAY 25 2011 JAN HBRBALY CLERK