FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CRAIG ARTHUR HUMPHRIES; WENDY
DAWN ABORN HUMPHRIES,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; LEROY
BACA, individually and in his
official capacity as Los Angeles No. 05-56467
County Sheriff; MICHAEL L. D.C. No.
WILSON, individually and in his CV-03-00697-JVS
official capacity as a Detective Central District of
and/or Deputy of the Los Angeles California,
County Sheriff’s Department; Santa Ana
CHARLES T. ANSBERRY, individually
and in his official capacity as a ORDER
Detective of the Los Angeles
County Sheriff’s Department; BILL
LOCKYER, Attorney General, in his
official capacity as Attorney
General of the State of California,
Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed May 26, 2011
Before: Jay S. Bybee and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit
Judges, and Richard Mills, Senior District Judge.*
*The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior District Judge for the U.S. Dis-
trict Court for Central Illinois, Springfield, sitting by designation.
6901
6902 HUMPHRIES v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
ORDER
After finding Appellants to be the prevailing parties in this
case under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, we ordered Appellee County of
Los Angeles to pay 10% of Appellants’ attorney’s fees. See
No. 05-56467 (June 22, 2009) at 1, 3-4. We later adopted the
recommendation of the Appellate Commissioner, which cal-
culated this portion of the fee award to be $59,258.09. See
No. 05-56467 (Dec. 2, 2009) at 2.
The United States Supreme Court subsequently reversed
this portion of the judgment of this court. We likewise reverse
and remand the case to the district court for further proceed-
ings consistent with the decision of the United States Supreme
Court in Los Angeles Cnty, Cal. v. Humphries, ___ U.S. ___,
131 S. Ct. 447, 453-54 (2010).