United States v. Adolfo Montes-Castro

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 26 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10455 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-01277-DCB v. MEMORANDUM * ADOLFO MONTES-CASTRO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 24, 2011 ** Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. Adolfo Montes-Castro appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Montes-Castro’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. We have considered appellant’s pro se supplemental brief, the government’s motion to dismiss, and counsel’s motion to allow a pro se response to the government’s motion to dismiss. We deny the government’s motion to dismiss. We also deny appellate counsel’s motion to allow a pro se response. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 2 09-10455