United States v. Steven Munn

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 26 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50649 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:01-cr-00047-CBM v. MEMORANDUM * STEVEN BRADFORD MUNN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 24, 2011 ** Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. Steven Bradford Munn appeals from the revocation of his supervised release and the 11-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Munn’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Munn has completed his custodial sentence and no additional term of supervision was imposed. Accordingly, Munn’s appeal is dismissed as moot. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 09-50649