In Re Carmine's Broadway Feast Inc.

i` 141 1 1 \ Tr NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit IN RE CARMINE’S BROADWAY FEAST INC. 2010-1528 (Serial No. 78/934,642) Appea1 from the United States Patent and Trademark Ofiice, Trademark Tria1 and Appea1 B0ard. ~ ON MOTION Before GAJARsA, MAYER, and PRosT, Circu,it Judges. GAJARSA, Circu,it Judge. 0 R D E R Carmine’s Br0adway Feast Inc. and the Under Secre- tary for Commerce for Intellectua1 Pr0perty and Direct0r of the United StateS Patent and Trademark Office jointly move to vacate the Trademark Tria1 and Appea1 B0ard decision as moot and to remand for further proceedings The Board affirmed a rejection of Carmine’s Broad- Way's trademark application as likely to cause confusion with two trademark registrations U.S. Registration Nos. 1,444,609 and 2,864,349. Registrati0n N0. 2,864,349 has IN RE CARMINES BROADWAY 2 since been cancelled, and Reg'istration No. 1,444,609 is now owned by Carmine's Broadway and therefore no longer poses a bar to the present trademark registration Carmine’s Br0adway's ownership of Registration No. 1,444,609 subsequent to the Board’s decision does not mean that vacatur by this court is appropriate. See, e.g., U.S. Bcmcorp Mortgage C'0. v. Bon,ner Mall Partn.er- ship, 513 U.S. 18, 29 (1994) (holding that “mootness by reason of settlement does not justify vacatur of a judg- ment under reView"). The proper course is to remand the case so that the Board can consider the Carmine’s Broad- way's request for vacatur of the Board's decision. Accorgingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion for vacatur is denied. __ (2) The motion to remand for further proceedings is granted FOR THE COURT HAY 2 7 2011 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Beth A. Chapman, Esq. Raymond T. Chen, Esq. FlLE ‘~ s24 U.S. C01.lRT 0F APPEAl..S FOR T|'lE FEDERAL G1RCU|T MAY 27 2011 lAN I'5JRBAU CLEH(